• — about/contact —
    • — hello —
    • — latest —
    • mith reacts to stuff
      • baking shows
    • screaming into the void
    • stories

MiTHology (4.0)

  • Should Catholics celebrate Halloween?

    October 30th, 2025

    It’s that awful time of year again!, when all of Catholic/Christian Internet is blowing up and biting each others’ heads off about whether Christians should celebrate Halloween or not. Mostly, it’s Protestants making reels saying “we shouldn’t celebrate Halloween because it’s the devil’s birthday and if your children dress up they will become possessed” or some such, and Catholics stitching these reels with “acktchyoowally, All Hallow’s Eve is a Catholic holiday, the eve of All Saint’s Day, and a great time to pray for the dead and partake in some innocent fun, such as eating candy, carving pumpkins, and dressing up, as long as it’s nothing gory or demonic.” Then below those posts, you have other Catholics in the comments actually agreeing with the Protestants and saying that Catholics shouldn’t have anything to do with secularist Halloween traditions, that the forces of evil have taken over what ought to be a holy day.

    Everyone’s talking about it, so as a Catholic blogger, I guess I feel the urge to throw my two cents in there as well. I think I have a somewhat unique POV to offer, and will try not to just rehash everything you’ve probably already seen/heard on social media.

    Personally, I am against Halloween. But, I do allow and tolerate it in my house to an extent.

    My opposition to Halloween predates any actual moral convictions about it. Even as a kid growing up in an atheist family, I simply didn’t like it. Halloween 1996: got sick on Tootsie Rolls and threw up a lot; subsequently developed a phobia of vomiting. Halloweens 1997-2000: a constant series of stresses and fiascoes, competitiveness, weariness, annoyance, every year asking “why do I still do this every year?! I hate this!” Halloween 2007: I was the awkward miserable kid tagging along with my BFF to her friends’ Halloween party, silently looking on as the guy that I was obsessed with showed attention instead to the aforementioned BFF, who was in every way more desirable than me. Halloween 2020: my beloved dog got sick and a few days later died. I can’t recall ever a “good Halloween” experience in my whole life!

    Don’t get me wrong, I love Fall: I love apple cinnamon everything, pumpkin patches, orchard visits, colorful leaves, scarecrows, flannel, moody fall scenery, cemeteries in mist, and all of that. It’s just the pageantry and “spooky” and blood-and-gory everything, the parties and revelry, that I’ve never liked. I hate costumes. I hate going to strangers’ houses uninvited, I hate asking people for stuff, I hate partying. I have a troubled relationship with candy. After dark, I like to be indoors in my bathrobe with the TV on. Secular Halloween festivities simply don’t agree with me. It just never goes well.

    When I had my own kids, I did do Halloween with them, the first few years, because it is simply the thing to do with your kids, in America; it’s just part of being a parent, I figured. That’s just American culture, it’s what you do. And it was kinda fun and all, dressing up my kids in their cute little costumes and carving pumpkins. Nothing wrong with it, I thought. A bit of extra stress, something else I had to scour Pinterest for and spend money on and try and make happen, but that was all.

    But then, I became Traditional Catholic, and learned about the reasons why some tradcaths spurn Halloween. And I felt vindicated: so I was right all along, about this “holiday!” It is bad news!

    “But it’s a Catholic holiday!,” some influencers argue. “Don’t forego it – reclaim it!”

    Exactly. Reclaim it by going to Mass and praying for the dead – not by joining in the secular nonsense!

    And as for the first part of that argument, that it’s a Catholic holiday and that makes it okay: arguments like this really annoy me. Citing the antiquated origins of something as a reason for why it’s good or not. The way some people will say that the swastika is an innocent symbol because “well, before the Nazis it was a symbol of good luck!” Okay, sure, but you know what, certain things have happened between now and then! That symbol has a whole other connotation now that you cannot just choose to ignore! Or that (one of my dear husband’s favorite fun facts:) pink is actually a masculine color because the fearsome, bloodthirsty Vikings had pink sails on their ships. That may be true, but that doesn’t change the years and years of associations around the color pink that exist in our culture; knowing this historical fact about the Vikings is not going to change anyone’s impression of you if you, as a straight man in this day and age, go around loving pastel pink.

    That’s how I feel about Halloween. True, it has Catholic origins – but that fact alone does not make the secularized version of Halloween a good thing. That would be like if we all started idolizing and celebrating some trashy celebrity who stars in x-rated films just because she was baptized Catholic when she was a baby. No! Catholics wouldn’t “reclaim” such a figure by engaging with her sinful content. The only thing we would want to celebrate, in that hypothetical situation, is that celebrity’s repenting and returning to the faith.

    Which is just what we should want for Halloween. Halloween, imo, should be about going to Mass and praying for the dead on the eve of November, the month of the holy souls.

    However! These are my personal views and feelings. But, as I said above, I do allow and tolerate Halloween in my family home.

    Why? Well, because: my husband’s views are different from mine. He loves Halloween, much the same way I love Christmas. Carving pumpkins and trick-or-treating with the kids and showing them Halloween movies is really important to him. And our marriage predates my little moment of vindication, my realization that Halloween actually is bad beyond just my personal icky associations. So, it wouldn’t be fair, for me to just suddenly demand that we ban Halloween. And I won’t do that, because I love and respect my husband; I’m not going to try and tell him he can’t have Halloween fun with his kids.

    Now, if I believed that trick-or-treating and carving pumpkins were an actual sin, sure I’d probably try and fight him on it. Compromise is necessary in a marriage, and we must yield somewhere, but we must never compromise on sin.

    I’m not sure I’m convinced that it’s actually sinful, though, to trick-or-treat or to carve a pumpkin or to dress up in costume. I’m not one of those who belives that simply by participating in those festivities with an innocent heart, you’re vulnerable to demonic possession.

    As long as costumes and decorations don’t involve any “undead” things that make light of the desecration of a human body, or demons, or witches, or murderers, or anything like that, I’m not too worried about it being a sin. Things my kids have dressed up as for Halloween include: bumblebees, dinosaurs, bunny rabbits, and, this year, owls. Pretty sure there’s nothing dangerous about this. I’m open to having my mind changed, though, so if any Catholic readers out there have a really strong case for why even these little pastimes are dangerous, please do send me your thoughts.

    It may not be a sin, technically, but that doesn’t mean I like it. I tolerate some Halloween, with restrictions, in order to appease my beloved husband. Because I don’t believe that all its trappings are evil simply because they are part of Secular Halloween. I’m not scared of Halloween, nor should any Christian be. It’s more like: this is just in bad taste; why would you do this, if you’re really a Christian?

    It’s hard, here in the US, where Secular Halloween is such a part of the everyday. I remember wearing costumes to class, back when I was in public elementary school in the late ‘90s. “What are you gonna be for Halloween?” is a run-of-the-mill small-talk question, in conversations with kids. My daughters had Costume Week at their ballet studio this week (and yes, they did dress up as owls, which was a pretty funny spectacle in a roomful of pretty little princesses and unicorns and cheerleaders and Disney heroines). It’s just everywhere. As Americans, this is our culture. So, I guess it’s really hard, for American Catholics, to separate the secular from the religious Halloween. But, imo, it’s worth the effort, even if it makes you look weird. We should look weird, to a culture that’s so un-Christian! Frankly, I would love to eschew Secular Halloween entirely – but, love makes us do silly things I guess.

    Now, when it comes to Secular Christmas, I think the same issue exists: for American Catholics, it can be tricky to figure out how much of the secular is okay to include in a proper Christian observance of the holiday. And there’s all this debate around it. Should Catholics do “Santa Claus”? I have a lot of feelings about this question, too, because unlike Halloween I actually like secular Christmas – quite a lot, lol. But, this question is slightly more nuanced, to me, because secular Christmas doesn’t exactly make a mockery/distortion of the Christian holiday the way secular Halloween makes a mockery/distortion of All Hallow’s Eve. I guess it could be argued that the commercialization of Christmas does just that – but, gift-giving is still a part of a proper Christian Christmas, right? It’s just that the secular version gets a bit carried away with it. Anyway – this is probably a post that I’ll write later, when that time of year comes around.

    In my household, I handle this Halloween compromise the same way I handle my vegetarianism (my husband’s a carnivore). I still cook and serve meat, I just don’t eat it myself, and my kids know that I don’t like it. One day, they’ll choose for themselves whether they want to eat meat or not. Similarly, my kids know that I don’t like Halloween. Maybe, when they get older, they’ll also come to dislike this holiday. At the very least, I aim to shelter them from the ugly aspects of it for as long as they’re under my roof, and to teach them the real meaning of All Hallow’s Eve.

    So yes: in my opinion, secular Halloween is a bad idea and Christians should not observe it. However, I also think it can be done innocently, if for whatever reason you really want to (which, why would you, unless you were married to a Halloween lover). I don’t think it’s scary or evil or going to corrupt your soul. And it goes without saying that certain Halloweenish themes like murder, the undead, witchcraft, and devils, are nothing to celebrate – and that certain popular Halloween habits like immodesty and gluttony are sins to be avoided. If you must do it, keep it clean, but really, why do it? That’s just my take. If you’re reading this, I wish you a blessed All Hallow’s Eve.

  • at the TLM with AVPD: one year in

    October 29th, 2025

    Being a Traditional Catholic, or even a practicing Christian at all, and having a diagnosis of avoidant personality disorder: these two things seem pretty mutually exclusive. I could be wrong, but I don’t think there are a lot of people out there who do both. Which is no surprise. In practice, the two seem downright antithetical. It is really hard being both.

    Tl;dr: it’s hard, but not impossible, being trad with AVPD; and actually very much worth the struggle. What follows are my little reflections on my first year at a trad parish.

    The Feast of Christ the King, 2025: it’s now been one year since I fully switched to regularly attending the TLM instead of the NO. It’s interesting that this anniversary falls on-or-around the Traditional Feast of Christ the King, because it was on this same feast day, albeit in the new calendar, that I was first confirmed Catholic, way back in 2014. One full year as a trad already, wow.

    “Just wait and see – after a year, you’ll never be able to imagine going back to the modern church,” I was advised. But actually, it took a lot less time than that! Within just a couple weeks of starting in Tradition – pretty much immediately upon meeting and conversing with some of the priests and community members, all of whom seem truly devout, welcoming, and genuine – I was completely sold.

    After a single TLM, I really struggled with being back in the NO. Even though I waffled back and forth for a few months (as you know if you’ve read my little conversion story). I’m not going to engage in the “liturgy war” stuff here, because that’s just not what I do with my little blog, and frankly I’m not smart enough to have that discussion even if I wanted to. It’s simply obvious to me that the faith being taught and practiced at my TLM parish is the true faith, and that I absolutely must keep going there.

    But, as someone with AVPD: it is hard! It is extremely hard.

    After the first time I attended the TLM, in June of last year, I was sure I would never go there again. It was beautiful and sacred and inspiring and all that, yes – but way too scary. I had no idea what was going on, and did all the things wrong, and felt intensely judged by everyone around me. My social anxiety was through the roof. I craved the safety of my familiar NO. But, when I went back to the NO, I found it more disappointing than ever. The irreverence began to really irritate me. And I felt drawn back to the scary, beautiful TLM parish, difficult as it was. So, long story short, I waffled back and forth for about five more months until I realized that I had to do the brave thing and go where the true faith was, even if it was scary.

    I was hoping that it would get less scary in time. I guess in some ways it has: I’m somewhat more familiar, now, with the basics, such as: how to use the missal, what the different parts of the Mass are, how to go to confession and communion, how to greet the Bishop (I messed this up terribly the first few times I met him!), how to request to have a sacramental blessed or to have a Mass offered for someone, what a “spiritual bouquet” is, and things like that. I still am not entirely confident about when are the right times to kneel, stand, sit, and cross oneself during Mass; I typically just follow what everyone else around me is doing. And I still feel like there are all manner of unspoken rules about being there, and being a member of the community – rules which I am constantly violating, but no one is saying anything because they’re being charitable. Which makes me feel like an absolute buffoon, a real obnoxious sore thumb sticking out in such a solemn, serene environment.

    Here’s one thing that weighs on me. And I doubt that this is the case in TLM parishes elsewhere, but at my parish, everyone is really, really financially comfortable. Or even just plain rich. My family, meanwhile is not what I’d call “financially comfortable.” Every single person I’ve met at church is substantially richer than me. (And no, I’m not presuming, this information is based on actual conversations I’ve had with people or overheard.)

    I feel there is a definite air of elitism. I’ve overheard or been involved in conversations in which people complain about poor neighbors – about people who make less than a certain amount, encroaching on their wealthy neighborhoods. Which is fair, I mean, if you have that kind of money fair and square and you want to use it to live somewhere safe and beautiful and secluded, why not! I can totally understand not wanting to be surrounded by poverty and the risks that come with it! I’d do the same thing, if it were me, no doubt. I don’t think there’s anything un-Christian about wanting security and comfort for your family (as long as you’re not demanding ostentatiousness or excess, which are not the trend at my parish). But, it does make me feel like an outsider here, knowing that I’m the kind of person they look down on and don’t want in their neighborhood. Even though everyone there is always perfectly nice to us, I can’t help feeling like they’re gritting their teeth and doing their best to practice Christian charity whenever they speak to me.

    All of which leads me to wonder if I really am morally inferior, for being relatively poor. Sure poverty isn’t always a moral failing – bad things do happen to good people – but, a great deal of the time, it’s the result of laziness and irresponsibility. If I were a good person, like my fellow parishioners, if I’d had my priorities straight and I’d made the right decisions, wouldn’t I, too, be able to afford twenty acres and a bunch of livestock, a private boarding school education and fine, all-natural, “aesthetic” clothing for my kids? I feel like my poorness is just a mark of personal failure.

    My past is riddled with financial mistakes. I’ve been stupid and immature and addicted and mentally unwell for most of my adult life, and now I’m living with the consequences. Even though I’m trying to be better, I feel like I still reek very strongly of bad decisions, shallowness, pleasure-seeking, worldliness, uncivilized behavior – all of that. I am intensely aware that everyone at church is intensely aware of it, this odor of baseness and worldliness and irresponsibility; and it’s intensely uncomfortable. Like having spiritual BO that everyone can smell.

    Again, though, all of this is coming not from anyone’s actual treatment of me, but out of my own presumptions about them. So it’s entirely possible that no one there actually looks down on me at all. However, I like to put up a bit of a wall of paranoia, just in case. Please don’t let your takeaway from this post be that “traditional Catholics are elitist and judgmental”, because I have no actual evidence that they are. They’re actually really nice. It’s probably just a coincidence that everyone at my parish is rich, and that makes me uncomfortable because I am insecure and have AVPD and am always finding reasons to presume that people hate me.

    But, this overpowering sense of being inferior, of being out of place, definitely contributes to a temptation to return to the NO world. At my previous, modern parish, there were parishioners from all walks of life: I’d literally see rich folks with professionally-done hair and fancy handbags, and homeless folks carrying black garbage bags, at the same Masses, and in between, a mixed bag of elderly folks (probably like 75-80% boomers and retirees), a few college kids if it was during the school year, Hispanic folks, Black folks, Filipino folks, you name it; it was a pretty diverse parish. Perhaps this diversity was due to the location, being downtown in the middle of a pretty diverse and affordable city, whereas my new, TLM parish is located rurally, an hour away out in a wealthy county near a very wealthy town, where many people are Landowners.

    According to the internet, it apparently is true in America that traditionalist Catholic communities tend to be overwhelmingly white, as opposed to the mainstream Catholic population being more Hispanic/Latino. However, the internet wasn’t able to tell me much about whether trads tend to be richer in general than “normal” Catholics. I’m interested to visit other TLM parishes and see if they’re also full of rich folks. Do any other American trads out there have any anecdotal evidence to share?

    – Anyway, all of this diversity stuff being tangential to the thing about being tempted to return to the NO. There, I still experienced social anxiety, of course (I do not miss the Sign of Peace! Even now, at the TLM, every time we near the end of the Canon of the Mass and the priest gets ready to say the Pater Noster, I get a reflexive wave of anxiety and queasiness). But because of the casual environment, it was much less intense there. There, I never worried about being the poorest person in attendance; it was simply never something that crossed my mind, there. And it was much easier to know what to do; the “rules” were much less strict.

    Not to mention, they had a nursery where my kids could play and I could listen to the Mass through the speakers while watching them. Now, obviously I know better now, that we shouldn’t just let our kids play during Mass, that they need to be taught to sit quietly and be reverent and respectful. And that we shouldn’t reward their naughty behavior by taking them to the playroom! At the TLM there is no “nursery,” no toys or puzzles or dollhouses, which my younger children really resented at first, for a few months after we changed parishes, before they got used to it. And there shouldn’t be one! Kids should learn to be at Mass! – But, it sure was easier on me, as a mom, that way. The pressure of managing my noisy young kids at TLM/in the cry room is psychologically crushing, sometimes. Being a parent with AVPD is wild because every time I go anywhere with the kids, it feels like everyone is judging every single thing I do or don’t do, and thinking what a bad parent (i.e. a terrible person) I am – and at TLM, where there are certain expectations about correct parenting, this sense is amplified x1000. Trad parents typically demand better behavior from their kids than your average American parent. I end up feeling like I’m too strict by modern standards but too lax by trad standards. I feel like I’m getting it wrong from every angle.

    So it’s rough. It’s barely gotten easier. As we speak, I am literally sick with dread about the approaching weekend: a Holy Day of Obligation on Saturday, so two Masses back to back, followed by a social event for All Saint’s Day.

    But that’s terrible, isn’t it?! I shouldn’t be sick with dread about attending Mass, which is the pinnacle of my spiritual life as a Catholic, and a privilege which the angels in heaven would love to have! I was listening to a sermon the other day which says that the devil knows our temperaments and will use them to detract from our participation in the Sacraments in whatever way he can – if he can’t keep us away from Mass entirely, he will at least try to diminish and worsen our presence there. Perhaps at risk of blaming on the supernatural a problem which is in fact entirely, boringly natural (spiritual warfare is a very real thing, but I think sometimes people probably get carried away with it; like, no, it’ s not a demon telling you to eat that fourth donut, lol, you just need to walk away and go drink some water; I guess it just makes these little daily things so much more interesting if we can call them “spiritual warfare,” lol!), I feel like this is what’s going on with me. Sometimes it really feels like something is using my AVPD to try and keep me away from the TLM, even though I know that it is where I need to be.

    I would love to just fit in and belong there. I’d love to be “one of them.” I remember back in middle and high school, when the AVPD first began to be crippling; in those days, I had no religion, just secularism and a desire to belong; and I believed that the best people, the ones who had it all figured out, were the “alt” kids, the edgy crowd with the black and white stripes, the guitars and drums, band tees, pins, dyed hair, dark humor, all of that. It was the same exact feeling then as now: I wanted to be one of them, and tried so hard to fit in, but never quite did, was always the sore thumb, and it was agonizing. Then, as now, I had this imaginary person in my head who exemplified that group and was constantly reminding me of how horribly I was failing to meet the standard. (Back then, it was a pretty nebulous concept of a person, but these days, I’m more self-aware about it, and now she actually has a name and lore; I decided it might be fun to try and humanize her a bit.)

    So perhaps it’s all very immature of me to worry so much about “fitting in” at the parish. I mean, don’t they want to attract people from all walks of life? Don’t they want to save the poor just as much as the rich? Aren’t we, as followers of Christ, supposed to care about the poor and the lost? Don’t they want their reach to extend beyond the predictable rich educated landowners? They’re supposed to want to convert sinners! They ought to be glad that I’m there, right? – ha!, that’s a stretch.

    In any case, attending the TLM with AVPD continues to be a struggle, one year in. But, one year in, I am more convinced than ever that going back to the modern Mass is not an option. Church shouldn’t be easy and comfortable, after all. We go to Mass to offer sacrifice. And you don’t grow if you remain comfortable all the time.

    And furthermore, it’s awesome to me to finally belong (formally, if not socially) to a church where I can confidently, proudly look at it and say “this is what I believe” – where I feel the immediate reality of the supernatural, where everything the Church teaches is seen to be really real, where I truly trust the priests to guide my eternal soul. Always, at the NO, even before I really knew what Tradition was, I always felt disconnected from the modern style of worship and the modern approach to Catholicism; I had a hard time being moved by it, it felt removed from the heavy eternal truths that religion is supposed to be actually about; and for a long time I failed to grow in the faith. (Which is not to say that the NO doesn’t produce saints; it’s probably just that I’m a particularly weak and stupid and inattentive little person who needs a very strong liturgy and a firm hand, in order to captivate and nourish and discipline me.) So I’m really lucky to live close enough to a TLM parish where I can get these spiritual needs met.

    Even if it is a challenge. I wonder if, in another year or two or three, it will be any easier. Probably not.

    Don’t let this post dissuade you from visiting the TLM, if you’re reading this and you’re curious about it, or you’re socially anxious and avoidant like I am. The TLM is indeed more difficult, but it’s worth it. As I’ve said before, I no longer have any hope of “getting over” my AVPD, and have accepted that this is just who I am, and no amount of “practice” or “exposure” will make me more socially comfortable; but that’s not to say that it’s not also good to stretch oneself a bit, to occasionally leave the comfort zone in some controlled way, within reasonable limits and for good reason. Because if we did everything the AVPD way, we’d never do anything at all, which would not be very good for our eternal souls. Human life is uncomfortable, that’s just a fact, and I guess we all need to live with that truth in whatever way we’re meant to, if we want to attain heaven, where there will be no more discomfort. But, who knows.

    Sometimes it feels like someone with AVPD can’t possibly go to heaven. If I care that much about what other people think, to the point that it even hinders my attendance at Mass, then clearly I’m not of one mind with God, Whose opinion should be the only one that matters to me! How can I possibly go to heaven if I’m too socially anxious to participate in charitable activities like working at the soup kitchen, teaching little kids, and volunteering at a homeless shelter (believe me, I’ve tried all of these in the past, when I was trying so hard to make it in the NO world, and I was simply terrible, useless, fumbling, and awkward at it, which led me to believe that there was no way I could ever even be a real Catholic)?

    But of course, I know it’s true that no one actually deserves Heaven. And it’s true that God’s mercy is bigger than all of our weaknesses, and He is so powerful that He can save even a miserable avoidant loser like myself if He wants to. So, I try to just place all my hope in the Blessed Mother, because, as a mom myself I know how it feels to love your kids completely and want to give them everything, in spite of their behavior, and I know that her love for each one of us is kinda like that but infinitely greater even than my love for my children (unfathomable!), and I know that, while God is both just and merciful, she is all mercy.

    Even though the TLM world feels scarier and has a reputation for being more judgmental, I actually feel like it’s given me a healthier POV on salvation, and made me more OK with myself overall. Being in tradition has actually helped me accept that I don’t need to be cured of my personality; God made me weird and that, if He wants to, He can save even me – that it is possible for me to be Catholic and have AVPD at the same time.

  • Protected: spooky season (4: dollhouse)

    This content is password-protected. To view it, please enter the password below.

  • Protected: spooky season (3: wings)

    This content is password-protected. To view it, please enter the password below.

  • Protected: spooky season (2: symphony)

    This content is password-protected. To view it, please enter the password below.

  • Protected: spooky season (1: reflection)

    This content is password-protected. To view it, please enter the password below.

  • GBBO series 16 episode 8: Mith Reacts

    October 25th, 2025

    Caution: Spoilers

    “When I come back next week, it’s gonna be full-on honey badger fight. Jasmine’s not having that star baker.” – Aaron, at the end of the episode

    “Oh, I can see it squidging.” – Tom, of his freestanding trifle, at the end of the showstopper

    Did anyone else find this episode disappointing all around?

    For one: I was so excited when I saw that it was Dessert Week, but all of the desserts in this episode were kind of blah. All those cheesecakes, and not a single flavor combination that sounded yummy. And then, gluten-free steamed puddings? And then a bunch of booze-soaked trifles? Womp womp. For two: poor dear little Iain going home. He’ll be fine, I mean he’s like 20 years old, so just a baby, and he’s got a beautiful pole-dancing fiancee and all, so, he has his whole life in front of him. But, I’ll sorely miss seeing him and his Irish elfin antics on this show.

    And, for three: Jasmine getting star baker again. It’s just getting boring, at this point! Her bakes are perfect and traditional and classic every time. Everyone else is a little more interesting to watch – Aaron with his avant garde flavors, Tom with his ambitious designs, Iain with his fine arts skills, and Toby’s quirky and fun style – but Jasmine’s just textbook perfection, challenge after challenge. Which I guess is what they’re looking for, on this show, really, and I respect that. But, still. It is kind of cool that Jasmine is the last woman standing this year.

    It was wild how this week the placements did a perfect one-eighty from the signature to the technical. In the signature, we had Aaron and Jasmine in the lead, Toby in the middle, and Tom and Iain at the bottom. Then in the technical, we had Tom and Iain in first place, Toby in the middle, and Jasmine and Aaron in the bottom! Which makes things extra tense, going into the showstopper, because you know so much is hanging on that last challenge.

    Another perfectly symmetrical thing that I noticed, that I don’t think I’d ever seen in this show before: in the technical, the order in which the judges tasted the puddings was the exact order in which the contestants placed, from worst to best: Aaron, Jasmine, Toby, Iain, Tom. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m pretty sure they were even seated in that order, each in front of their own bake. What a weird little coincidence!

    Of note this week: Toby said during the signature that he thinks he will be “one week and one week only” as a Star Baker. I’m curious to see if that will come true. Will Toby win star baker next week, or possibly even the final? I’m sure the winner will be Jasmine, but, I can still get my hopes up. I like Toby a lot, and I love that he’s a fan of Christmas like I am. But I do wonder: how, as a British baker, had he never once made a steamed pudding before?, lol.

    I’m also allowing myself to get my hopes up for my favorite, Aaron! He’s been my favorite since Pui Man went home in week three, and he’s still here! He really has a shot! He didn’t do well in the technical this week, but his saké plum cheesecake got perfect reviews, and his champagne-raspberry-chamomile-peach trifle apparently tasted amazing even though the textures were off. He might just win it.

    And even if he doesn’t, we’re at the point now – the final four/five – at which all of the contestants are successful. They will go down in Bake-Off history as some of the best. If you make it to the quarterfinal, you’re pretty much Bake-Off nobility, if not royalty. Any one of these contestants could go on to like get a cookbook published or get their own TV show or land a great job somewhere at the drop of a hat, if they wanted to.

    One other mildly interesting thing that I learned about this week: “Flipping Nora,” apparently a milder version of the colloquialism “Bloody Nora,” is, according to Google, a phrase “used to express surprise, irritation, or dismay.” Never heard that before in my life. And we heard it from Jasmine, of all people, lol!

    That’s about all I’ve got for this week. It was not my favorite episode. Only two episodes left. What do we think will happen? Leave me your comments!

    “Claggy” count: 0 (running total: 5)

    “Concertina” count: 0 (running total: 1)

    High point: Tom’s first technical win! He was saying after the signature that he really wanted to do well in the technical, and then he not only did well, but finally won. He’s been wanting to win one for weeks.

    Low point: The lack of a single chocolate dessert in the entire “Dessert Week” episode. Toby did use white chocolate in his marbled cheesecake, but that just barely counts.

    The dessert that I would most have liked to eat: Really, none of them. I was so disappointed that all of the trifles were soaked in booze! I don’t do alcohol, so these were all off-limits for me, which was devastating, because Tom’s Greek trifle sounded amazing: fig, almond, and honey – I was so excited about that one! But, in any case, he fell victim to almond extract, which, I literally do not know why any baking show contestant ever dares to touch almond extract for any reason, anymore, and the judges said it didn’t taste that great. Bummer all around. I guess if I had to pick one from this episode I’d go with Tom’s gothic-looking black sesame basque cheesecake, just for the vibes.

    .

  • GBBO series 16 episode 7: Mith Reacts

    October 18th, 2025

    Contains Spoilers for this episode, as well as Series 5 (2014)!

    “This is so fun, Toby. You’re gonna really enjoy this!” – Iain, the first one to start in the staggered-start-time technical challenge, as Toby, the second, walked in

    I think it goes without saying that Iain was the undisputed hero of the show’s first ever Meringue Week. Both his signature and showstopper made references to the history of the show itself: a little treat for us longtime fans. He’s clearly a huge nerd for this show, and I love it. The “lucky” rhubarb paid off, and then he went and won the technical (despite adding a truly aggressive excess of sugar to his soufflés), and then, in what was possibly the funniest thing to happen on this show since Bingate itself – Bingate: Redemption.

    Was anyone else cry-laughing as Iain explained his trash-can-shaped showstopper?! As soon as I heard them explain today’s challenge – Vacherin Glacé, i.e. ice creams encased in meringue, sound familiar? – my mind went to baked Alaska, which of course made me think of Bingate, and wonder if another such fiasco would ensue. But, I’d completely forgotten that the guy who chucked his Baked Alaska in the trash back in 2014 was also named Iain and also from Belfast! (I just remembered him as an angry bearded white guy.) So this was just a hilarious coincidence, which this year’s Iain capitalized on brilliantly. I only wish that the judges had loved it more, so that the redemption would have been even more satisfying. Conveniently, though, 2025 Iain could “pass the buck” and blame the questionable flavor combo (coffee and dark chocolate) on 2014 Iain, which was again hilarious. I’m just dying to hear 2014 Iain’s response to this episode.

    Iain may have been the hero this week, but Toby was the star baker – and well-deserved! Wasn’t it nice to see him win one? At first my husband and I were worried for him, because Paul seemed unenthused when Toby was explaining his plans for his signature – but then he ended up with the best signature of them all! He really did something original with the little meringue lattices on those apple tarts. I’m not that big on tropical flavors myself, so I wasn’t that interested in his mango-coconut showstopper, but the judges both loved it, and it was completely lactose-free which is pretty cool, and the meringue didn’t crack, which is quite a feat in itself; frankly, I was just glad to see him win instead of Jasmine, for once. His call home at the end was the best of the season so far, too.

    I kind of got my hopes up that my favorite, Aaron, might win again. His signature was incredible, he was second in technical (one place ahead of Toby), and his showstopper was incredibly beautiful. “Ethereal,” as Paul described it. The monochromatic look was so bold, so elegant! But, I guess the judges weren’t so into the flavor combination – lemongrass, key lime, and stem ginger. It sounded refreshing, but, I guess they didn’t find it as delicious as Toby’s. Also, Aaron was the only one to merengue with Alison, which deserves a win imo.

    How about Tom? Just like last week, he had me nervous, after not doing great in the signature and coming in next-to-last in technical – but then he saved himself with an amazing showstopper. Meanwhile, Jasmine was almost perfect once again, producing A+ signature and showstopper (Paul is apparently tired of giving her handshakes, lol) – but then! her soufflé in the technical was liquidy! Mark it on your calendars: this day was the day that Jasmine did a single thing wrong on Bake-Off.

    Poor Lesley. From the start, I had a bad feeling that she was going to go home, when her lemon-raspberry tarts were “gloopy;” then she came in last in technical, after having to re-bake her tuiles. To her credit, though, considering how she had to churn out a second batch of meringues after botching the recipe the first time in the showstopper, she still managed to produce something very beautiful and delicious! Paul actually couldn’t stop eating her lemon-basil-strawberry “wedding cake” Vacherin. Unfortunately, the meringue was, predictably, underbaked, and because this whole episode was supposed to be about meringue, it’s fair that they dinged her for that. She was such a good sport, though. What a lovely person! As Prue pointed out, Lesley was in some ways the ideal baker: just having a good time, not trying to be cutthroat nor edgy, never getting too flustered or stressed. “Less haste, more speed,” Lesley said to herself in the signature. I’ll remember that one.

    One other high point of this episode: Noel’s “fruit impressions” banter session with Jasmine. Why were his blueberry and mango so on point?! I wanted to see him do all of the fruits!

    “Claggy: count: 0 (running total: 5)

    “Concertina” count: 0 (running total: 1)

    High point: Bingate: Redemption, obviously. This is probably the high point of the whole season so far.

    Low point: Iain not getting rave reviews, tears of joy, a handshake, and Star Baker for Bingate: Redemption.

    The dessert that I would most have liked to eat: Easy: Aaron’s blackcurrant-chestnut tarts in the signature. If you know me, you know I have a thing for blackcurrant. Combined with chestnut and yuzu, this sounded so different, and so fabulous. Usually Aaron’s flavors are a bit too adventurous for me, but I was so here for this one.

    My official prediction for the order of eliminations from here on out: sad to say it but probably Toby, then Iain, then in the final: Aaron, Tom, and of course the winner will be Jasmine.

    What are your thoughts? Leave comments!

    .

  • GBBO series 16 episode 6: Mith Reacts

    October 11th, 2025

    Contains Spoilers for this episode, as well as for Series 8 (2017) and series 12 (2021)!

    Is it just me, or was this week massively disappointing? So much freaking sausage! I can deal with the occasional savory challenge here and there, but two in a single episode? Gross! I come to this show to ogle sweets, not for lard and pork and hard-boiled eggs. I feel like either the signature or the technical should have been a sweet pastry. I’d never even heard of a Gala Pie, but it did seem like an incredibly dated dish. Noel kept making jokes about how retro these dishes are, referring to little postwar 1950s kids in shorts eating lard sandwiches (“please, guvnor!”). Give a Gala Pie to any Gen Z, he said, and watch them start to weep and wail about “trauma.” Lol. I mean, to be fair, this show is supposed to be about classic British baking, which includes a whole lot of meat pies. It just turned my poor vegetarian stomach, watching all that leaky ground meat.

    Which was why I was rooting for dear little Iain in the signature, out there representing for us herbivores! His tofu-broccoli “claddagh ring” pie looked and sounded really good. I just wish Paul had liked it more; apparently it was flavorless. (C’mon, you can’t serve flavorless tofu on TV! Don’t perpetuate the false stereotype!) It would have been nice if Paul’d been proven wrong about tofu twice in a row. Apparently the last time a contestant wowed him with tofu it was some actor from the show “Friends,” who I guess appeared on Celebrity Bake-Off at some point; I didn’t watch that one.

    On the bright side, though, Aaron pulled through! (Again with the avant garde flavors, Aaron! Jasmine, ginger, and peach gel?! He’s so imaginative; I love to see it.) I was so sure he would be going home; even though his signature spicy Jamaican beef curry dish got rave reviews, he was last in technical, and made the mistake of using jasmine extract in his showstopper. How do people on these shows keep on making this mistake, lol? 99% of the time, in a baking show, if someone uses any extract other than vanilla, it bites them in the butt. Whenever you see someone using this that or the other extract, just know you’re about to watch them get chewed out about it. I was prepared to lament the loss of yet another favorite.

    But it ended up being Nataliia instead. Which is fair, I guess – her chicken kyiv in the signature was too liquidy, she was fifth of seven in technical, and, like Aaron, she was personally victimized by artificial flavorings in the showstopper. I’m bummed! She was such a delight. This season will be a lot less fun without her, going forward. And anyway, I still thought her showstopper looked and sounded amazing, regardless of the raspberry extract. Paired with pistachio praline, chocolate ganache, and crème diplomat: yes, please. Speaking of baking show tropes: what a shame that she went out right after playing the formidable Dead Grandparent Card!

    I am curious, though, and maybe someone can enlighten me: what was up with Tom’s rivalry with Toby going into the technical? Why was Tom like “I just want to beat Toby”? Looking back over the previous episodes, Toby won the technical in weeks one and two, whereas Tom was last in the technical in episode one and sixth in two. In episodes three and four, Toby was a few places ahead of Tom. Last week, though, Tom was in spot number four and Toby in number five, so it’s not like Tom’s never beat Toby before. Do they have some sort of frenemy thing going on behind the scenes, lol? In any case, this week Tom was sixth and Toby ahead of him in fourth, so I guess the battle rages on, if there is one.

    Tom did do great in the showstopper, though. “Tom’s back in the tent,” Paul proclaimed, upon tasting that beautiful “risalamande”-flavored, Connect Four (ahem, “Four in a Row”) game-shaped tart. That was super impressive, and sounded delicious – you know I love cherry-almond flavors. If only he hadn’t used kirsch, this probably would have been my favorite bake this week.

    Other stand-out bakes in the showstopper (because honestly none of the signature bakes nor gala pies stood out to me, blegh): Lesley’s gorgeous honey-glazed pecan pie covered in those precious little painted bumblebees. It’s so good to see her come out of the woodwork lately and start to really shine! And of course, we can’t not mention Iaian’s “Giant’s Causeway” tart. He’s such an artist. I’ve had the privilege of visiting the actual Giant’s Causeway, so this was really fun for me personally. What a bummer that he drenched it in so much whiskey, though. Too much booze even for Prue!

    And in other news, guess who won again (yawn). I’m seriously getting bored of seeing Jasmine do everything perfectly every single challenge, lol. Can she just crash and burn once? Just kidding, of course. Huge congratulations to her, she is an absolute force of nature! It’s giving Sophie Faldo. Y’all remember how Sophie also just sailed through every challenge with a poker face, and never seemed even slightly shook? I’d like to see her and Jasmine in a bake-off, honestly.

    Other than Tom and Jasmine in the final, I really have no idea what could happen in the coming weeks. I was pretty sure it’d be Toby or Lesley going home today; shows how much I know! It’s nice that this show can still surprise me.

    And so far this season, the judging has seemed really fair; not once yet have I exclaimed “what tha hail?!” when the judgment’s been called, like I did when they eliminated Juergen in series 12 for example (seriously, though, I still wonder what the hail that was about). I appreciate that they’re looking at each contestant’s performance in each challenge throughout the show; they’ve been perfectly logical with their decisions, rewarding consistency. I have no complaints yet. What are your thoughts? Leave me a comment!

    “Claggy” count: 0 (running total: 5)

    “Concertina” count: 0 (running total: 1)

    High point: “Oh, wow! Finn MacCool!” – Iain, with elfish delight, setting up his little decorated “giant” pastry figurines on his Giant’s Causeway-themed tart; immediate cut to a rather harried and grumpy Toby, glaring, muttering “no matter how stressful it is, you can always hear Iain having a nice time.”

    Low point: Paul’s little temper tantrum at Toby while judging his signature. Not even a single word of congratulations for making the full puff pastry work, after being explicity told “it’s not possible”? Paul even dropped the word “bloody” in there (which, if I understand correctly, is a pretty vicious word to use, over in the UK). Is it just me, or did it seem like Paul was kind of mad that Toby proved him wrong? His thing wasn’t even that bad! To me, this kind of set a sour tone for the whole rest of the episode.

    The bake that I would most have liked to eat: Toby’s burnt honey and mascarpone tart with blackberry reduction. Such a bummer that he didn’t have time to finish the little goat decorations (he thought had 4.5 hours but it was actually only four; I felt so bad for him, because that’s the exact same kind of dumb mistake that I make in my own life on the daily), but, the judges still loved the flavors. It sounded awesome! Toby was apparently my hero this week.

    .

  • GBBO series 16 episode 5: Mith Reacts

    October 4th, 2025

    Contains spoilers for this episode of GBBO!

    “I’m a chronically disorganized person; worried about all of it, really!” – Toby, when asked what he’s worried about going into the showstopper

    “Doin’ hand jelly again!” – Iain, frantically carrying handfuls of cherry jelly across his station as time runs out in the signature

    Of note this episode: Tom and Noel made a deal that if Tom gets to the final, there will be banana coladas served. (Banana coladas? Sounds gross, imo, but as we know Paul is a big fan of banana flavor.) It’s almost certain that Tom will be in the final, so I’m eager to see if they follow through on this! Do you think they will?

    In the little intro interview Nadia coolly observed that she felt confident, going into Chocolate Week, and knew what she was doing. The second she said that, my husband remarked: “She’s doomed.” We’ve learned to pay attention to these little subtle, foreshadowy hints that the editors drop. Poor Nadia! Meanwhile Aaron, in the same segment, said that he loves chocolate, and seemed excited and happy. My brain is tempted to try and squeeze some sort of spiritual lesson out of this, that it’s better to work from a place of love rather than from any sort of confidence in ourselves, or something, hahaha. But I think it was just thoughtful editing.

    It’s too bad about Nadia. But I was thrilled for Aaron! Especially after all Alison’s jokes about the “rivalry” between Aaron and Tom, who both did tiramisu flavors in the signature; Tom, thus far, had had two star bakers, as Alison pointed out, while Aaron had none yet. The win was a pleasant surprise! It’s funny: I don’t typically love the flavors that Aaron chooses – they’re always so highbrow and adventurous! Thyme-infused white chocolate tart? Five-spice and sesame florentine? Not for me. But, he’s just so likeable and nice, and just seems like a really lovely individual, and his style is so elegant and stylish. I guess I choose my favorites based on personality rather than products. Is that weird? My husband thinks Aaron will be a finalist. Maybe the Curse of Mith’s Favorite is finally broken!

    Readers, what do we think of the switched-up format for the Technical this week? Artistic license! The “gingham pantry!” This was something they’ve literally never done before. In the technical, everyone always has to make the exact same dessert, that’s the rules; but this week, they got to top their white chocolate tarts however they wanted and choose their own flavor combinations. I personally loved it, as a one-time surprise, maybe something to do very seldom – but wouldn’t want to see it become a regular thing. Because the whole point of the technical is comparing different iterations of a single recipe.

    Who had your favorite flavor combo in the technical? I loved Nadia’s blackberry-raspberry, but then she came in last. Jasmine’s looked great, too, with the raspberry and hazelnut and dark chocolate ganache; but the judges said the dark chocolate overpowered and took away from the white, when it was supposed to be “about” the white chocolate. Which is fair, but, still sounds delicious. Poor Iain this challenge! Watching him drop that tart was physically painful. At least he stayed in good spirits about it.

    Speaking of Iain, Paul commented that his showstopper looked like something out of Lord of the Rings, which was perfectly accurate, and the most Iain thing ever, because as you know I believe that he is secretly an elf. I was glad to see little Iain do well this episode. Although the technical was a disaster for him, he did well in both signature and showstopper. His fondue display was a recreation of some green Irish hillside that looked straight out of JRR Tolkien’s imagination. And but so he’s planning to propose to his very tall and very beautiful pole-dancing girlfriend at this very same elf kingdom locale in the near future!? How dear! Iain and Dervla: they do look and sound like two fantasy characters come to life, don’t they? I guess he has to do it now, and stat, because if he chickens out and then the season airs, everyone’s going to want to know what happened. Godspeed, little elf! I’m looking forward to the little updates that they always air during the end credits after the finale, now.

    Can’t not talk about how there were not one, but two Hollywood Handshakes given out this episode. In the beginning of the season, I said that there were no clear front-runners, but by this point, halfway through, Tom and Jasmine have definitely emerged as very clear front-runners. It’s hard to say which one is “better,” out of the two of them; they’re neck and neck. Tom seems more artsy and daring while Jasmine seems more classic and traditional. I’ll be positively floored if either one of them is eliminated before the final.

    Other highlights of this episode: Lesley “Techy Les” winning the technical! You all know I’m a fan of Lesley – she’s probably my other favorite alongside Aaron – and it was nice to see her in the spotlight. Nataliia’s “Last Day in Pompeii” showstopper was so cool; she always goes all-out with her ideas, and this time is really paid off; that black cocoa cake with raspberry-white chocolate sauce, mango-passionfruit curd and choux buns filled with passionfruit crème: dang! She’s out there doing the most. She has such a big, bright, and colorful personality, and seems to really pour that into her desserts. Also, Prue’s fruit-themed sweater: 10/10. On the downside, though, I was so disappointed that Toby’s showstopper didn’t get good marks. The campsite theme with the marshmallow and graham cracker cookies for dipping was such a clever idea, and seemed very “Toby.” Toby’s probably my other other favorite, alongside Lesley and Aaron. I kind of wish they could all win. Halfway through! Alas, it’s going by so quickly! We’ll find out soon enough.

    “Claggy” count: 0 (running total: 5)

    “Concertina” count: 0 (running total: 1)

    High point: Obviously Aaron winning star baker! His happiness is so infectious. Consistency is key, and Paul said that his piano was one of the best thing he’d seen in chocolate in a while. His little coffee cups in the signature were immaculate, too!

    Low point: Nadia’s signature challenge not working out. I was so excited to see white chocolate pistachio strawberry mousse cups – that sounded delightful, and was the dessert I was most excited about this challenge! They reminded me of little Easter eggs – but, tragically, the mousse didn’t set and the judges weren’t pleased.

    The dessert that I would most have liked to eat: I was bummed that almost all of the chocolate mousse cups in this challenge included booze. Pretty sure Jasmine’s chocolate-hazelnut one was one of the only ones that didn’t mention some kind of liqueur, so I’ll have to go with hers; can’t go wrong with those flavors. Although, Iain’s little medieval chalices looked so cool, and I love chocolate-cherry; if only he hadn’t flavored them with beer!

    .

  • GBBO series 16 episode 4: Mith Reacts

    September 27th, 2025

    Contains Spoilers for this episode, and for season 15 (2024)!

    Won’t lie: as an American, this episode had me confused! When I hear “flapjacks,” I think “pancakes.” What on earth is a British flapjack? According to Google, a British flapjack is a “baked oat bar, made from rolled oats, butter, sugar, and golden syrup, resulting in a chewy, sweet, and buttery treat that can be customized with ingredients like nuts or dried fruit.” So kind of like what we Americans might just call an “oat bar.” I learned a thing today!

    I was also unfamiliar with “school cake,” although this one was pretty self-explanatory; I guess this must be a lunchroom staple, over there, probably very nostalgic for an adult of my generation, the way I feel about tater tots, or those little cardboard cartons of chocolate milk (remember those??).

    And then, the showstopper: a summer school fête stall display? What is a summer school fête? As my husband pointed out, “Here in America we don’t do festivals, we do active shooter drills!” Lol. Google tells me that a British summer school fête is “a traditional, outdoor school event held during the summer term, featuring games, activities, and stalls to raise money for the school and foster community spirit,” which sounds charming and festive indeed, and, like so much of this show, makes me wish I were British.

    I actually didn’t care for the showstopper challenge this episode, though. The fact that they had to demonstrate three separate baking disciplines meant that, out of necessity, people kept it pretty straightforward with their flavors, for the most part; no one dessert really stood out as particularly showstopping, imo. But most of them did really well in this challenge. Only Jessika, Aaron, and Iain dropped the ball.

    Luckily for me, though, Aaron, my current favorite, came in second in the technical and absolutely killed it in the signature! His “flappy Js” (as Toby called them, lol) looked pristine, and his daring flavor choices paid off. Earl grey, whipped ganache, and lemon jam: not my personal cup of tea (ha ha), but I was just so pleased to see Aaron do well. If only his macaron had come together in the showstopper, he very well could have been star baker!

    But Jasmine really deserved the win again. She nailed every single challenge this week, didn’t do a single thing wrong, even came in first in the technical. As Paul said at the end, she is One To Watch. It was so obvious who was going to win and who was going home this week that I’d already written down both names at the bottom of my notebook page before they even announced them. (Yes, I take notes while watching, so that I can write these blog posts; my memory is not that good.)

    It was too bad though about Jessika! Like Prue said, she was so adventurous and creative, her ambition just got the best of her this week. I don’t drink wine anymore, but if I did, red wine/poached pear/stem ginger/dark chocolate probably would have been my “dessert I would most have liked to eat” this week; it sounded gorgeous. And honestly, the dinosaur she made in the showstopper was still incredibly cool, like, if an ordinary person in their home kitchen, not on a TV show, made something like that, it would blow everyone’s minds. Jessika was really likeable, and, as my husband pointed out, had kind of a Sporty Spice vibe. She will be missed.

    It was almost Nadia this week. Her chocolate didn’t set in the signature, simply because she had so much of it (which, although a failure, looked delicious, especially combined with her cherry and coconut flavors!); I winced watching her drag a knife through that still-wet chocolate. And then she came last in the technical. But, she pulled it back with that extremely daring showstopper – she managed to pull off not three, but four separate treats, including those very convincing little brownie “burgers.” What a relief!

    And I was bummed for poor little Iain that things didn’t work out for him this week. His banana bread flapjacks were underbaked (although, he claimed that he was going for that, to which Paul responded with acerbic sarcasm; how dare anyone try to correct Paul!); he did okay in the technical, coming in third, but then his showstopper was one of the worst. There was too much plastic in his display, and the judges weren’t pleased with his flavors – Paul even made a disgusted face when he tasted the too-sweet meringue. And dear little Iain just seemed so downtrodden, like, he seems to take it really personally when he doesn’t do his best – poor kid! But, hey, at least he got a chance to announce to the world that he’s dating a pole dancer, so, I guess he’s doing okay.

    And so now we’re down to eight. I can’t believe how quickly this season is going by! It’s so sad to me. I wait all year for this! I still think Tom could be the winner; he did really well this week in both the signature and the showstopper: his over-the-top “abstract apples” in the signature ended up almost perfect, and that showstopper “science fair” display was really impressive – he even managed to pull of the disgusting-looking little petri dish crème brulees! So, he’s still my pick for winner, as of right now.

    And I still think Iain will stick around for a while, too, even though he’s had a couple of bad weeks; I have a feeling that he will find his rhythm and rise back up to the top. Jasmine will probably also be a finalist; she has that consistency and that crowd-pleasing, classic style, kind of like Georgie who won last season. So that’s my current prediction for the final three. Although, I’m still personally cheering for Aaron. Let’s hope I don’t curse him like I did Hassan and Pui Man.

    Oh, and once again, I can’t not mention Noel’s shirt. His fashion choices are always entertaining, but rarely if ever do I think “I’d also wear that;” but two weeks in a row now!

    “Claggy” count: 1 (running total: 5)

    “Concertina” count: 0 (running total: 1)

    High point: “Does this mean we’re going out now?” – Noel to Alison during the technical, when he gave her the fortune teller. I may not be British but that whole halftime interlude was hard-hitting nostalgia for me! I used to love making fortune tellers for people at school (actually, I never really quit this, haha, I’d make them for my coworkers too, when we had downtime at work). And, hearing someone utter the phrase “going out” to mean “dating/in a relationship” – wow, I’d blocked that one out of my memory, lol! How asinine! Only 4th-8th graders use that phrase, I’m pretty sure, which is funny because kids that age are obviously not “going out” anywhere because they’re too young to drive, so for them “going out” just means “holding hands during recess” or “PDAs during lunch.” And once you’re old enough to actually take someone out on a date, you’ve outgrown the label “going out.”

    Low point: Watching poor little Iain get his feelings hurt.

    The dessert that I would most have liked to eat: Nataliia’s apple mousse in the showstopper! Genius. It was even in the shape of a perfect little apple, and the judges said it tasted so appley. With it being fall now, but still hot and muggy af (because I live in the South), this is precisely the dessert that I need in my life right now.

    .

  • Have I been going about this all wrong? (100th post!)

    September 24th, 2025

    How fitting that my one hundredth post on this silly little blog should contain a silly little epiphany about the previous ninety-nine posts of said blog.

    It seems I’m always going on about whether it’s okay to do this, whether it’s okay to do that. You probably find it annoying, and believe me, I do too! Sometimes while wondering about all these various conundra, I lapse into meta-wondering, and ask myself: why is it that I wonder about these things? Why can’t I just intuit what is the right thing to do in these situations? Why is it that some people, like the saints for example, just know what the right thing to do is?

    And it occurred to me: I think the problem might be that I’ve been coming at this from the wrong angle.

    “Can I get away with this?” “Can I get away with that?” “Is it permissible to do xyz?” Yikes. Imagine if your best friend or your spouse approached your relationship with that kind of attitude! If your husband was all “hey, I know it’s not cheating, technically, so is it permissible to stare at other women’s butts now and then if it’s just for a few seconds?”, or if your best friend was like “as long as I’m not actually making fun of her, is it okay if I just chuckle a little when someone else makes fun of her behind her back? because nothing personal but it was a really funny joke” – Both of these would be pretty abhorrent, wouldn’t they?

    If you really love someone, it’d be pretty unthinkable to approach your relationship with them that way. The saints would approach their relationship with God from a perspective not of “how much can I get away with?” but “how much can I give up to please Him? How can I possibly give more?”

    If something is at all questionable, then giving it up for God’s sake ought to be a no-brainer! It ought to be seen as a delight, even a privilege! The more unnecessary pleasures we have the opportunity to give up for God, the more sacrifices we can offer Him, the luckier we are, the more blessed we will be, right?

    So why don’t I just do it then! Why do I still enjoy my little unnecessary, frivolous, worldly pleasures.

    Well, because I guess it could be argued that doing so helps me to function well, by generally easing the burden of existence enough that it’s somewhat easier to do my work? But, maybe I shouldn’t be trying to ease the burden. Maybe I should be trying to take on more of a burden. That’s what a saint would do, isn’t it?

    I could continue to argue at this point, and keep trying to poke little holes and make little excuses here and there for why unnecessary pleasures are actually okay, but I’m starting to feel like maybe the saints are really just people who (to radically oversimplify) are better at being uncomfortable than most of us. Maybe they didn’t actually enjoy discomfort any more than the next person, they just did it anyway.

    Now I’m not trying to be like super extreme or anything. I’m well aware that even traditional priests and religious set aside time for recreation. But in these cases, “recreation” is limited, both in quantity and quality, to just what is necessary to refresh the soul, and it’s nothing unwholesome: things like outdoor sports, crafts, reading, talking with others, etc. They’re not, like, scrolling instagram or watching netflix or listening to shitty music or snacking on junk food or reading crime thrillers. They’re not doing anything that could be described as “lazy” or “trashy,” I’m pretty sure.

    Is there ever an excuse for any pleasures that are useless/trashy/lazy? Sure, I could just go “well, I’m not a saint yet, no point pretending I am one” and proceed to listen to my trash music and watch my trash reels and shows and eat cookies. But how else will I become a saint if I don’t give up all that junk? Is there room in a healthy diet for junk food? – When I was very serious about being skinny, I believed that there was absolutely no room for empty calories, which I can see now was disordered; am I falling once again into the trap of black/white thinking? Is it disordered to worry that there is no room for useless pleasures on the path to becoming a saint? Or is that really true?

    On the one hand: if I really love God, why would I waste a single second on anything that might be less than pleasing to Him? If I even begin to realize how much I owe Him, then why would I still try to get away with even the slightest questionable behavior?

    On the other hand: God in His infinite mercy and wisdom loves me even as the little trash person that I am, and He has a design for me that perhaps I should trust in; He will elevate me to holiness if and when He chooses to, and there’s nothing I can do about it, so perhaps I should just accept that as long as I’m doing my prayers and receiving the Sacraments and trying to avoid sin and all, I’m doing well enough for my state in life, and leave any advancements up to God?

    There are a lot of directions that I could take this in right now – my train of thought is branching off along like six different little paths right now – but, I’ll try to keep it concise. Probably the mere fact that I take all this time to write these stupid, rambly blog posts is just evidence of how far I am from holiness. Happy one hundredth post! Isn’t this apt. May God have mercy on me for my trashiness.

←Previous Page
1 2 3 4 5 6 … 12
Next Page→

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • MiTHology (4.0)
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • MiTHology (4.0)
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar